You’d think answering the question “What’s your income?” would be straightforward. And for some people, it is—you work a salaried job, you get a W-2, done.

But for many couples I work with in mediation, determining “income” for spousal support purposes becomes surprisingly complex. And getting it right matters enormously, because every dollar we count or don’t count affects the support calculation.

California takes a broad view of what constitutes income for spousal support purposes. The basic principle is this: if money is flowing to you from any source, it likely counts as income. But the devil, as they say, is in the details.

Let me walk you through what counts, what doesn’t, and why having a mediator with financial expertise like me makes a real difference as you work through these questions.

The straightforward stuff: wages and salary

If you’re a W-2 employee earning a regular salary or hourly wage, this part is easy. Your gross income from employment counts. That’s your income before taxes and deductions, not your take-home pay.

But even here, we need to be careful. Are you receiving fairly consistent overtime? That should probably be included in your regular income. Do you work seasonal hours that vary significantly throughout the year? We need to calculate an average. Did you get a raise or a promotion? We need to use your current earning level, not what you made last year.

In mediation, we look at your recent pay stubs to get an accurate picture of your current earnings. We’re not trying to lowball or inflate the numbers—we’re trying to establish what you’re actually earning right now, because that’s what matters for calculating fair California spousal support.

Bonuses and commissions get complicated.

This is where things start getting interesting. If you receive annual bonuses or earn commissions, do those count as income for support purposes? The answer in California is usually yes, but with nuance.

If you receive a consistent annual bonus—say, your company gives everyone a 10% year-end bonus and has done so for the past five years—that’s clearly income we should factor in. But what if your bonus varies wildly from year to year based on company performance? What if you work on commission and your income swings dramatically month to month?

In these situations, we typically look at historical averages over the past few years. Suppose your bonuses have averaged $20,000 annually over the past three years. In that case, that’s probably a reasonable amount to include in your income calculation, even if any single year might be higher or lower.

This is where my MBA comes in handy. I help couples analyze compensation structures, look at trends, and determine what’s a realistic and fair number to use for variable income. We’re not just plugging numbers into a formula—we’re doing financial analysis to get an accurate picture.

How yearly earnings are evaluated when calculating spousal support in California. For help reviewing your income history, contact Equitable Mediation at (877) 732-6682.

Stock options, RSUs, and equity compensation

Welcome to the 21st century, where increasingly people receive significant portions of their compensation in forms other than cash. Stock options, restricted stock units (RSUs), employee stock purchase plans, and other forms of equity compensation are common, especially in California’s tech-heavy economy.

California generally considers these forms of compensation as income when they vest or when you exercise them. If you’re receiving RSUs that vest quarterly, each vesting event is an income event for support purposes. If you exercise stock options and realize a gain, that gain is income.

But the timing matters. Stock that hasn’t vested yet isn’t income today. Underwater options (i.e., the strike price is above the current stock price) have no current value. We need to look carefully at vesting schedules, stock prices, and actual realizable value.

In mediation, I work with couples to understand these equity compensation packages and determine what’s fair to count as income. Sometimes we use historical averages of vested equity. Sometimes we project future vesting based on current stock prices. The key is that both spouses understand what we’re including and why.

Self-employment and business income

If one or both of you own a business or are self-employed, calculating income becomes significantly more complex. Your business tax returns might show a profit or loss, but that doesn’t necessarily reflect your actual income available for support purposes.

Why? Business owners often structure their finances to minimize taxable income. You might take legitimate business deductions that reduce your reported income but don’t actually reduce your standard of living. Company cars, business meals, home office deductions, depreciation – these all reduce your taxable income but don’t reduce the money available to you.

California law looks at your real economic benefit from business ownership, not just what shows up on your tax return for alimony. We need to sift through your business returns and “add back” certain expenses that are really personal benefits. This requires sophisticated financial analysis—precisely the kind of work my financial background prepares me to do.

How detailed income records are used when calculating spousal support in California. For expert financial review support, call Equitable Mediation at (877) 732-6682.

In mediation, we review business statements such as Income Statements and Profit & Loss Statements together, line by line if necessary, to understand your real income. This isn’t about catching someone hiding money (though we’ll address that too). It’s about accurately determining economic reality.

Rental income and investment returns

If you own rental property, the rental income generally counts as income. But we need to distinguish between gross rents and net rental income after legitimate expenses, such as mortgage payments, property taxes, insurance, and maintenance.

Investment income—interest, dividends, and capital gains—typically counts as income for support purposes. If you have a portfolio generating $30,000 in dividends and interest annually, that’s income we need to factor in.

One wrinkle: what about investments in retirement accounts that are growing but you’re not taking distributions? Generally, the growth inside retirement accounts doesn’t count as current income. But once you start taking distributions from retirement accounts, those distributions are income.

In mediation, we look at all your income-producing assets and determine which are actually generating cash flow and should be counted. A $500,000 retirement account isn’t income. But a $500,000 investment account generating $25,000 in annual dividends is.

Retirement and pension income

If you’re receiving Social Security benefits, pension payments, or distributions from retirement accounts, these count as income. Even though you might think of them as “just getting back what you put in,” California treats them as current income available for support purposes.

This becomes especially relevant in gray divorces involving older couples where one or both spouses are retired or nearing retirement. Your retirement income is income, plain and simple.

Unemployment and disability benefits

Unemployment insurance benefits count as income. Disability insurance payments generally count as income. Workers’ compensation benefits can count as income. Public assistance like welfare generally doesn’t count, but most other government benefits do.

The reasoning is straightforward: these are dollars coming to you that you can use to meet your expenses, so they’re relevant to determining how much support you need or can pay.

What doesn’t count as income?

Some things explicitly don’t count as income for support purposes. Child support you receive for your kids isn’t income – that money is meant for your children, not for you. Gifts from family members aren’t income (though if you’re receiving consistent “gifts” that are really disguised support, we need to look at that carefully). Loans aren’t income. Money you’re withdrawing from your own savings isn’t income – it’s just moving your own money around.

The distinction matters because people sometimes try to inflate or deflate income by pointing to money movement that isn’t really income at all.

The critical importance of full disclosure

I cannot overstate how important it is that both spouses provide complete and accurate information about all income sources. In mediation, we work on trust and good faith. If you’re hiding income or failing to disclose your income sources, you’re not just being dishonest with your spouse—you’re undermining the entire mediation process.

California requires full financial disclosure in divorce. You’ll need to complete income and expense declarations that detail all your income sources. These aren’t suggestions—they’re requirements. And they need to be accurate.

In my practice, I help couples gather and organize this information. We look at tax returns, pay stubs, bank statements, brokerage statements, and business records. We make sure we’re capturing the complete picture. This isn’t about being adversarial—it’s about making sure both spouses have the information they need to negotiate fairly.

Man and woman reviewing financial documents together, symbolizing the transparent income sharing needed when calculating spousal support in California. For guidance creating fair disclosures, contact Equitable Mediation at (877) 732-6682.

Handling income that varies dramatically

Some couples face the challenge of income that varies dramatically from month to month or year to year. Maybe one spouse is a salesperson whose commissions swing wildly. Maybe you’re in an industry with seasonal work. Maybe you’re self-employed and your income is simply unpredictable.

In these situations, we typically look at multi-year averages to smooth out the volatility. If your income was $80,000 one year, $120,000 the next, and $100,000 the year after, we might use $100,000 as your income for support purposes. We’re trying to find a number that’s representative of your actual earning pattern, not the outlier high year or the outlier low year.

In mediation, we can also structure support arrangements that account for income variability. Maybe support is calculated as a percentage of actual income rather than a fixed dollar amount. Maybe we can build in review periods to adjust support as income circumstances change. These flexible approaches are much harder to achieve in litigation but work beautifully in mediation.

Why getting income right matters so much

Every dollar we count as income affects the support calculation. If we understate your income by $10,000, the support amount will be off. If we overstate it by $10,000, the support amount will be off in the other direction. And we’re not just talking about slight differences—depending on the formula and circumstances, a $10,000 income error might translate into several hundred dollars per month in miscalculated support.

Getting the income numbers right is foundational to reaching a fair support agreement. This is where having a mediator with an MBA in Finance, like me, provides real value. I can help you analyze complex compensation structures, understand what counts — and what doesn’t —and arrive at accurate income figures that both spouses can trust.

Your income picture should be clear, not murky.

Determining what income counts for spousal support purposes isn’t about playing games or manipulating numbers. It’s about establishing an accurate, honest picture of each spouse’s financial resources. When we get the income calculation right, everything that follows—the support amount, the duration, the overall settlement—rests on a solid foundation.

In mediation, we work through these income questions together in a transparent, good-faith manner. You both deserve to understand where the numbers come from and why they matter. And you both deserve a support calculation based on reality, not guesswork or gamesmanship.

“You may have researched how alimony works in your state. But in my experience, regardless of whether a state offers guidance on how to resolve alimony, often, couples negotiate their own agreement tailored to their unique situation and circumstances.

So you have a lot of flexibility and can maintain a lot of control if you negotiate the terms of alimony out of court with the help of a skilled professional using an alternative dispute resolution process like divorce mediation or a collaborative divorce .

You and your soon-to-be ex-spouse will more likely come to an alimony arrangement that's acceptable to both of you."

Joe Dillon headshot

Joe Dillon | Divorce Mediator & Founder

FAQs About Alimony in California

Alimony, legally referred to as spousal support or maintenance in California, is a court-ordered financial payment that one spouse provides to the other during separation, divorce proceedings, or after the marriage has been dissolved. The fundamental purpose of these support payments is to assist the lower-earning spouse in maintaining a reasonable standard of living and achieving financial independence following the end of the marital relationship. California Family Code sections 4320 through 4360 govern how spousal maintenance operates within the state’s family law system. The process works in two distinct phases: temporary support during divorce proceedings (sometimes called pendente lite support) and long-term or permanent support established in the final divorce judgment. Courts evaluate numerous factors when making support determinations, including each party’s earning capacity, the marital standard of living, the duration of the marriage, and the financial needs and abilities of both spouses. Unlike child support, which follows specific calculation guidelines, spousal maintenance awards involve considerable judicial discretion based on the unique circumstances of each divorcing couple.

The duration of spousal support payments in California primarily depends on the length of the marriage and the type of support ordered. For marriages lasting fewer than ten years (considered short-term marriages), California courts commonly establish support duration at approximately half the length of the marriage. For example, if a couple was married for six years, the supported spouse might receive maintenance for roughly three years, although this is a general guideline rather than a strict rule. Marriages of ten years or longer are classified as long-duration marriages under California Family Code Section 4336, and these cases receive different treatment. For long-duration marriages, judges retain jurisdiction indefinitely and cannot set a definite termination date at the time of judgment, meaning support could potentially continue for many years depending on circumstances. However, this does not guarantee lifetime alimony; instead, it means the court can revisit and modify the support arrangement as long as the order remains active. Support automatically terminates upon certain events, including the death of either party, the remarriage of the supported spouse, or when the court determines the supported spouse no longer needs assistance or has become self-supporting. The reasonable period for support is determined by how long it would take the supported spouse to obtain the education, training, or work experience necessary to become financially independent.

California judges must evaluate an extensive list of statutory factors outlined in Family Code Section 4320 when determining both the amount and duration of long-term spousal support. These mandatory considerations include the marketable skills and earning capacity of each spouse, along with the job market for those particular skills and any time or expenses required for the supported spouse to acquire education or training for employment. Courts examine the extent to which the supported spouse’s earning capacity was impaired by periods of unemployment during the marriage to permit devotion to domestic duties, recognizing career sacrifices made for the family’s benefit. The standard of living established during the marriage carries significant weight, as courts attempt to allow both parties to maintain a lifestyle reasonably comparable to what they enjoyed while married. Each party’s assets, debts, income from all sources, and overall financial needs are analyzed in detail. The court also considers the duration of the marriage, recognizing that longer marriages typically warrant longer support obligations. The age and health of both spouses factor into determinations, as physical or mental conditions may affect earning ability and financial needs. The ability of the supporting spouse to pay support while meeting their own reasonable needs is balanced against the needs of the spouse seeking support. Additional factors include documented evidence of domestic violence, the balance of hardships to each party, and the goal that the supported spouse become self-supporting within a reasonable period. Tax consequences, though changed by recent federal law, remain relevant for California state tax purposes. Finally, judges may consider any other factors deemed just and equitable in the particular circumstances of the case.

California employs different approaches for temporary versus permanent spousal support calculations. For temporary support during divorce proceedings, most counties use a computer-based guideline formula, often called the “DissoMaster” or “XSpouse” calculator, which generates a support amount based primarily on the parties’ incomes and certain deductions. A common rough estimate suggests taking 35 to 45 percent of the higher earner’s income and subtracting 40 to 50 percent of the lower earner’s income, though actual calculations involve more complexity. This computerized approach provides consistency and predictability during the interim period while the divorce is pending. However, for long-term or permanent spousal support established in the final divorce judgment, California law explicitly prohibits using a formula. Instead, it requires judges to apply the comprehensive Family Code Section 4320 factors discussed above. Courts must consider each statutory factor and make specific findings about the circumstances of the marriage, earning capacities, needs, standard of living, and other relevant considerations. This means there is no mathematical formula or calculator that can definitively determine permanent support amounts; instead, each case requires individualized analysis of the unique facts and circumstances. The judge exercises considerable discretion in weighing these factors and determining what constitutes a fair and reasonable support arrangement. Spouses can negotiate and agree upon any support amount and duration they find mutually acceptable. Still, if they cannot reach an agreement, the judge must use the multi-factor analysis rather than any predetermined calculation to establish the support order.

The widely misunderstood “ten-year rule” refers to how California courts treat marriages of long duration, defined explicitly in California Family Code Section 4336 as marriages lasting ten years or more from the date of marriage to the date of separation. The misconception is that crossing the ten-year threshold automatically guarantees lifetime alimony payments, but this is legally incorrect. What actually happens for marriages of long duration is that the court retains jurisdiction to review and modify spousal support orders indefinitely, meaning there is no automatic cutoff date for the court’s authority to revisit support. For marriages under ten years, courts commonly set support duration at approximately half the marriage length. Once that period expires, the court generally loses jurisdiction unless the order explicitly reserves jurisdiction. In contrast, for long-duration marriages, even though the judge cannot set a definite termination date at the time of judgment, they can establish a review date when the supported spouse must demonstrate continued need for support or face termination. California public policy has evolved away from the outdated concept of permanent lifetime support, as recognized by case law emphasizing that spousal support should last only as long as reasonably necessary for the supported spouse to become self-supporting. The ten-year milestone is significant because it affects the court’s ongoing jurisdiction over support matters, allowing for continued review and modification based on changing circumstances. Still, it does not create an entitlement to indefinite support regardless of circumstances. Factors such as retirement, remarriage, cohabitation, changes in income, or the supported spouse achieving self-sufficiency can all lead to modification or termination even in long-duration marriages.

Remarriage and cohabitation have distinctly different legal effects on spousal support obligations in California. Under California Family Code Section 4337, if the spouse receiving support remarries, spousal support automatically terminates without requiring a court hearing or further legal proceedings. This automatic termination reflects the legal presumption that the new spouse assumes financial responsibility for supporting the remarried party. The supported spouse has a legal obligation to notify the paying spouse about the remarriage; failure to do so can result in a court order requiring repayment of support improperly received after remarriage. This automatic termination rule applies unless the parties’ divorce settlement agreement states explicitly otherwise—spouses can negotiate arrangements where support continues despite remarriage, though this is uncommon. Past-due support obligations and any vested lump-sum payments remain enforceable despite remarriage. Cohabitation—living with a new romantic partner without marriage—does not automatically terminate support but can provide grounds for modification or termination. Under California Family Code Section 4323, cohabitation with a non-marital partner may be considered a changed circumstance that justifies reducing or ending support payments. The paying spouse must file a motion with the court requesting modification and demonstrate that the supported spouse is cohabitating with a partner in a relationship resembling marriage. The court examines whether cohabitation has reduced the supported spouse’s financial needs because they share living expenses and receive support from their new partner. Simply having a roommate does not necessarily qualify, as courts look for evidence of a romantic, committed relationship involving mutual financial support and sharing of resources. The supported spouse can rebut the presumption by proving they still require support despite the living arrangement. The burden falls on the paying spouse to prove that circumstances have changed sufficiently to warrant modification.

California law permits both modification and termination of spousal support orders when circumstances significantly change. However, the process and requirements differ based on the type of support and the duration of marriage. Either spouse can request modification by filing a Request for Order with the family court that issued the original support judgment. The moving party must demonstrate a “material change of circumstances” since the original support order—substantial changes in either party’s financial situation that make the current support amount unfair or inappropriate. Examples of qualifying changes include the paying spouse experiencing involuntary job loss, significant income reduction, disability, or legitimate retirement (typically around age 65), which may justify decreasing support. Conversely, substantial income increases by either party might warrant modification—the paying spouse’s higher earnings could support increased payments, while the supported spouse’s improved income might justify reduction or termination. Health issues, severe illness, or disability affecting either party’s earning capacity or expenses can trigger modifications. The supported spouse’s failure to make reasonable efforts toward self-sufficiency despite court warnings (known as a Gavron warning under Family Code Section 4320) may lead to reduced support or termination. Courts can assign “imputed income” to a supported spouse who voluntarily remains unemployed or underemployed despite having marketable skills and available employment opportunities. Cohabitation with a new partner, as discussed above, can justify modification even without remarriage. For marriages under ten years, once the support order expires, courts generally lose jurisdiction to modify unless jurisdiction was specifically reserved. For marriages of extended duration (ten years or more), courts retain indefinite authority to review and modify support. Parties can also negotiate modification agreements outside of court, but court approval is required to make the changes legally enforceable. Temporary support orders during divorce proceedings can be modified more easily than final support orders. It’s important to note that modifications typically take effect only from the date of filing the request, not retroactively, so timing matters significantly.

The tax treatment of spousal support in California is undergoing a significant change that depends on when your divorce agreement is finalized. California recently enacted Senate Bill 711, which will conform California’s tax treatment of spousal support to federal law starting January 1, 2026.

For divorce agreements or court orders executed on or after January 1, 2019 but before January 1, 2026, there is a split between federal and state tax treatment. Federal law eliminated the tax deduction for alimony payments made by the paying spouse, and recipients no longer report spousal support as taxable income on federal returns. However, California did not conform to these federal changes during this period. For California state income tax purposes, spousal support remained tax-deductible for the paying spouse on their California state return, and the receiving spouse had to report support payments as taxable income on their California state tax return. This created a disconnect between federal and state tax treatment, requiring taxpayers to make adjustments on Schedule CA when filing California returns to account for the different treatment of alimony.

Starting January 1, 2026, Senate Bill 711 changes this split treatment for new agreements. For any spousal support agreement entered into after December 31, 2025, spousal support will be neither deductible for the paying spouse nor taxable income for the receiving spouse at both the federal and California state level. This creates complete tax neutrality and eliminates the confusing split treatment that existed from 2019 through 2025. The new tax treatment also applies to modifications of existing agreements made after December 31, 2025, but only if the modification expressly provides that Senate Bill 711 applies. If you modify an existing pre-2026 agreement without specifically invoking SB 711, the old split tax treatment should continue to apply to that agreement.

For divorce or separation agreements executed on or before December 31, 2018, the original tax rules continue to apply at both federal and state levels. Payments remain deductible for the payor and taxable income for the recipient on both federal and California returns, and this federal AGI (Adjusted Gross Income) figure carries over to the California return without adjustment.

Qualification for spousal support in California is not automatic and depends on demonstrating financial need and disparity between the spouses’ circumstances. Generally, the spouse with significantly lower income or earning capacity may qualify for support if they can establish that they need financial assistance to maintain a reasonable standard of living while working toward self-sufficiency. Key qualifying factors include a demonstrable income disparity between spouses, where one spouse lacks sufficient property or income to maintain reasonable needs and the marital standard of living. The supported spouse must demonstrate a need for time to acquire education, training, or work experience that will make them employable and self-supporting, especially if they have sacrificed career opportunities during the marriage to fulfill domestic duties or support their partner’s career advancement. Marriages where one spouse is the primary wage earner and the other handles domestic responsibilities or raises children often result in support awards. Courts examine whether the requesting spouse’s earning capacity was diminished during the marriage due to an extended absence from the workforce. Several circumstances can disqualify someone from receiving spousal support or result in denial or termination. If the spouse requesting support has a comparable or higher income, substantial assets, or significant financial resources making support unnecessary, they likely won’t qualify. A valid prenuptial or postnuptial agreement waiving spousal support rights is generally enforceable, disqualifying the spouse from seeking court-ordered support unless the contract was executed under duress, fraud, or other circumstances making it unconscionable. Short-term marriages (especially those under three years) may not warrant support, or support duration may be very limited. Evidence that the supported spouse is not making reasonable good-faith efforts toward self-sufficiency despite court orders can lead to termination, especially with a Gavron warning in effect. Remarriage automatically disqualifies the former spouse from continued support. A supported spouse who has achieved self-sufficiency and no longer requires assistance will have support terminated. Receipt of substantial inheritance, lottery winnings, or other financial windfalls may eliminate the need for support. California law also provides that a spouse convicted of domestic violence against their partner may receive reduced support or be ordered to pay additional support beyond what would usually be awarded. Voluntary unemployment or underemployment when capable of working can result in imputed income, reducing or eliminating support eligibility.

California recognizes several distinct types of spousal support, each serving different purposes during and after the divorce process. Temporary spousal support, also known as pendente lite support (Latin for “pending litigation”), is awarded. At the same time, the divorce case is actively ongoing, from the time one party files for divorce until the final judgment is entered. This temporary support helps the lower-earning spouse maintain financial stability and pay living expenses during what can be a lengthy divorce process. Courts typically calculate temporary support using standardized guideline formulas based primarily on income differences between the spouses, providing quick determinations without extensive litigation over the numerous Family Code Section 4320 factors. Permanent or long-term spousal support is established in the final divorce judgment and continues after the divorce is finalized. Despite the term “permanent,” this support is not necessarily lifelong but instead continues for whatever duration the court deems appropriate based on a comprehensive analysis of all statutory factors. Long-term support requires a detailed examination of the 4320 factors and cannot be calculated by formula. Rehabilitative alimony is a specific type of support designed to provide financial assistance while the supported spouse obtains education, vocational training, or work experience necessary to become self-sufficient. Courts favor rehabilitative support that has a defined end date and a clear plan for the supported spouse to reenter the workforce or enhance their earning capacity. This type commonly applies in shorter marriages where the lower-earning spouse needs only temporary assistance to reestablish their career. Reimbursement spousal support compensates one spouse for financial contributions made toward the other spouse’s education, training, or career development during the marriage. For example, if one spouse worked to put the other through medical school with the understanding that both would benefit from increased future earnings, reimbursement support acknowledges those contributions. Lump-sum alimony provides a one-time payment or property transfer instead of ongoing monthly fees. This arrangement can give finality and avoid continued financial entanglement between former spouses. Modifiable versus non-modifiable support is another important distinction—parties can negotiate that support payments remain fixed and cannot be modified regardless of changed circumstances, or they can preserve the court’s jurisdiction to modify support as circumstances warrant. Couples can also agree to “Smith-Ostler” orders, which include support based on both a base amount and a percentage of any bonuses, commissions, or additional income earned by the paying spouse. However, these orders can be complicated to administer and enforce.

Lay the groundwork for a peaceful divorce

About the Authors – Divorce Mediators You Can Trust

Equitable Mediation Services is a trusted and nationally recognized provider of divorce mediation, serving couples exclusively in California, New Jersey, Washington, New York, Illinois, and Pennsylvania. Founded in 2008, this husband-and-wife team has successfully guided more than 1,000 couples through the complex divorce process, helping them reach amicable, fair, and thorough agreements that balance each of their interests and prioritizes their children’s well-being. All without involving attorneys if they so choose.

At the heart of Equitable Mediation are Joe Dillon, MBA, and Cheryl Dillon, CPC—two compassionate, experienced professionals committed to helping couples resolve divorce’s financial, emotional, and practical issues peacefully and with dignity.

Photo of mediator Joe Dillon at the center of the Equitable Mediation team, all smiling and poised around a conference table ready to assist. Looking for expert, compassionate divorce support? Call Equitable Mediation at (877) 732-6682 to connect with our dedicated team today.

Joe Dillon, MBA – Divorce Mediator & Negotiation Expert

As a seasoned Divorce Mediator with an MBA in Finance, Joe Dillon specializes in helping clients navigate complex parental and financial issues, including:

  • Physical and legal custody
  • Spousal support (alimony) and child support
  • Equitable distribution and community property division
  • Business ownership
  • Retirement accounts, stock options, and RSUs

Joe’s unique blend of financial acumen, mediation expertise, and personal insight enables him to skillfully guide couples through complex divorce negotiations, reaching fair agreements that safeguard the family’s emotional and financial well-being.

He brings clarity and structure to even the most challenging negotiations, ensuring both parties feel heard, supported, and in control of their outcome. This approach has earned him a reputation as one of the most trusted names in alternative dispute resolution.

Photo of Cheryl Dillon standing with the Equitable Mediation team in a bright conference room, all smiling and ready to guide clients through an amicable divorce process. For compassionate, expert support from Cheryl Dillon and our team, call Equitable Mediation at (877) 732-6682 today.

Cheryl Dillon, CPC – Certified Divorce Coach & Life Transitions Expert

Cheryl Dillon is a Certified Professional Coach (CPC) and the Divorce Coach at Equitable Mediation. She earned a bachelor’s degree in psychology and completed formal training at The Institute for Professional Excellence in Coaching (iPEC) – an internationally recognized leader in the field of coaching education.

Her unique blend of emotional intelligence, coaching expertise, and personal insight enables her to guide individuals through divorce’s emotional complexities compassionately.

Cheryl’s approach fosters improved communication, reduced conflict, and better decision-making, equipping clients to manage divorce’s challenges effectively. Because emotions have a profound impact on shaping the divorce process, its outcomes, and future well-being of all involved.

What We Offer: Flat-Fee, Full-Service Divorce Mediation

Equitable Mediation provides:

  • Full-service divorce mediation with real financial expertise
  • Convenient, online sessions via Zoom
  • Unlimited sessions for one customized flat fee (no hourly billing surprises)
  • Child custody and parenting plan negotiation
  • Spousal support and asset division mediation
  • Divorce coaching and emotional support
  • Free and paid educational courses on the divorce process

Whether clients are facing financial complexities, looking to safeguard their children’s futures, or trying to protect everything they’ve worked hard to build, Equitable Mediation has the expertise to guide them towards the outcomes that matter most to them and their families.

Why Couples Choose Equitable Mediation

  • 98% case resolution rate
  • Trusted by over 1,000 families since 2008
  • Subject-matter experts in the states in which they practice
  • Known for confidential, respectful, and cost-effective processes
  • Recommendations by therapists, financial planners, and former clients

Equitable Mediation Services operates in:

  • California: San Francisco, San Diego, Los Angeles
  • New Jersey: Bridgewater, Morristown, Short Hills
  • Washington: Seattle, Bellevue, Kirkland
  • New York: NYC, Long Island
  • Illinois: Chicago, North Shore
  • Pennsylvania: Philadelphia, Bucks County, Montgomery County, Pittsburgh, Allegheny County

Schedule a Free Info Call to learn if you’re a good candidate for divorce mediation with Joe and Cheryl.

Related Resources

  • Illustration of a California map overlayed with a house icon and dollar sign beside a mediator discussing spousal support options with a couple. Need clear guidance on alimony in California? Call Equitable Mediation at (877) 732-6682 to schedule your consultation today.

    Alimony in California: A Divorce Mediator’s Complete Guide to Navigating Spousal Support

    Find out how alimony in California works and how you can prevent your spousal support negotiation (and divorce) from turning into a disaster!

  • Illustration of a California map overlayed with a house icon and dollar sign beside a mediator discussing spousal support options with a couple. Need clear guidance on alimony in California? Call Equitable Mediation at (877) 732-6682 to schedule your consultation today.

    New Jersey Alimony Guide: How Spousal Support is Really Calculated

    Determining alimony in NJ is very challenging. Learn what you need to know about this complex topic and how to get a fair alimony agreement.

  • Illustration of a California map overlayed with a house icon and dollar sign beside a mediator discussing spousal support options with a couple. Need clear guidance on alimony in California? Call Equitable Mediation at (877) 732-6682 to schedule your consultation today.

    New York Alimony Negotiations: a Guide to Spousal Support Settlements

    Despite the use of a formula, agreeing on New York alimony is still difficult! Find out what you need to know and how to best resolve it.